Drawing for COMBAT PAK

USPTO serial 77711896

COMBAT PAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUONG, ANGELA GAW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMBAT PAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Ko Craft

Jennifer Ko Craft Gordon & Silver, Ltd.3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, 9th FloorLas Vegas, NV 89169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplements; VitaminsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 29, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Oct 29, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 1, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 20, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 15, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 23, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 20, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 17, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 18, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 21, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 21, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 15, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Apr 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance