Drawing for LIVE THE LEGEND

USPTO serial 77712581

LIVE THE LEGEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LIVE THE LEGEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin Daley

KEVIN DALEY THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Interactive programs in the nature of computer games for distribution via electronic means; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; providing entertainment in the nature of computer games and entertainment information via communication and computer networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2010CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 3, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 19, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 19, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 18, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 16, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 7, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 1, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 1, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 1, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 1, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance