USPTO serial 77712762
VIPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. DuPre'
JOHN L. DUPRE' HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C.PO BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Head-mounted and helmet-mounted video viewers and display modules incorporating liquid crystal displays for military and industrial applications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |