Drawing for TERRIBLYCLEVER

USPTO serial 77712933

TERRIBLYCLEVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUJA, SANDRA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TERRIBLYCLEVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca E. McDougall

Rebecca E. McDougall Roberts Mlotkowski Safran & Cole P.C.7918 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 500McLean, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software applications for mobile devices, namely, phones, PDAs and handheld computers; mobile software applications for academic institutions and universities that enable them to disseminate course registration information, course syllabi and assignments, campus events, calendars, course captured lecture videos, bills, sports news, schedules and other athletic content, student and faculty directories, maps, advertisements and academic information to students, and that enable students to register for courses, plan schedules, view bills and establish live connections with other students and various university departments for live chat, live help, troubleshooting, and academic purposes; mapping software; computer software for application development, deployment and managementACTIVE
042Software engineering, development and design; computer software consulting services; design and development of software for mobile devices; design of corporate and educational micro web sites; providing an online website for creating and hosting micro web sites for businesses; design and development of web sites for others; design and development of corporate intranet sites for businesses; design and development of enterprise software solutions; development of applications for social networking platforms; hosting of web sitesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 19, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 18, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
May 17, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 17, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 11, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 11, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Nov 18, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 24, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 3, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 22, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 22, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 22, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 22, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 22, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Sep 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 11, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Apr 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance