USPTO serial 77713626
ORGANIC LAUNDROMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORGANIC LAUNDROMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Teterboro, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane H. Lee
DIANE H. LEE THE LAW OFFICES OF DIANE H. LEE2460 LEMOINE AVE STE 402FORT LEE, NJ 07024-6210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Biotechnological cleaning solution for eliminating odors, breaking down organics, and removing stains; Detergent soap; Disinfectant soaps; Fabric softeners for laundry use; Germicidal detergents; Laundry bleach; Laundry blueing; Laundry detergent; Laundry detergents; Laundry soap; Soaps and detergents | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Automated dispensing machines for laundry detergent; Automated laundry detergent dispensers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Soap dispensers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |