USPTO serial 77713647
ACCUPHARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4159507Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2012
- Examiner
- TRIPI, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACCUPHARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jae Youn Kim
Jae Youn Kim Novick, Kim & Lee, PLLC3251 Old Lee HighwaySuite 404Fairfax, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Automatic medicine packing systems comprising a medicine packing machine and a drive controller; automatic medicine packing machine; machines using rollers for feeding sheets of packing material to medicine packing machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) Computer software for use in data collection, processing, storage, accessing and management in the fields of medicine, diagnostic medical testing and pharmaceuticals; computer software for pharmacy automation, namely, software for operating machines for dispensing pre-determined dosages of medication; computer software for pharmacy management, namely, software for use in tracking inventory and preparing reports on inventory; computer software for use in pharmacies, namely, software for use in scheduling and placing prescription drug refill orders for pharmacies; computer programs recorded on data media (software) for use in managing prescription records, management records, and inventory records of medication; computer memories; (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) machines for dispensing pre-determined dosages of medication; automatic medicine inspection system comprised primarily of an optical vision apparatus and a camera | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 19, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |