USPTO serial 77714858
SIMPLIFYING TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMPLIFYING TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Castle, IN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer programming; Computer programming and computer system analysis; Computer programming and software design; Computer project management services; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider and web hosting provider to host web sites for others; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer software consultancy; Computer software design; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer software development and computer programming development for others; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting in the field of information technology; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Customization of computer hardware and software; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Design and maintenance of computer sites for third parties; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Developing and updating computer software; Information technology consultation; Installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Integration of computer systems and networks; IT consulting services; IT integration services; Monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; Technical consulting and assistance with computer-based information systems and components; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |