USPTO serial 77715224
FLOWERING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4081425Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 3, 2012
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLOWERING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl E. Gustafson
KARL E. GUSTAFSON MCMILLAN LLP1500-1055 West Georgia StreetPO Box 11117, Royal CentreVancouver, BC, V6E4N7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | plant nutrients, namely, fertilizers and soil additives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |