Drawing for MINDBANK

USPTO serial 77715267

MINDBANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINDBANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scot A. Duvall

Scot A. Duvall MIDDLETON REUTLINGER2500 Brown & Wiliamson Tower401 S. Fourth AvenueLouisville, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Credit inquiry services, namely, providing references regarding the creditworthiness of individuals and institutions, financial services, namely, tracking and tracing of financial transactions for others in connection with credit cards, credit institution, banking, capital investment, fund investment, the establishment of guarantees, foreign exchange, clearing, security management credit, financial services, financial management, loans against securities, property management, financial analysis, check verification, financial consultations, credit card services, debit card services, electronic funds transfers, the issue of credit cards, home-banking, namely, online banking, computerized financial services, electronic currency transfer, mortgage lending and monetary servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 22, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 23, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 23, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 9, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
May 4, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance