Drawing for EZ-TRACK

USPTO serial 77716354

EZ-TRACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IMAM, AMEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EZ-TRACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

I. Morley Drucker, Esq.

I. MORLEY DRUCKER, ESQ. FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DRIVE, TENTH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011PLUMBING FITTINGS, NAMELY DRAINS; PLASTIC TRENCH DRAINS; PLASTIC TRENCH DRAINS FEATURING PLASTIC CHANNEL SEGMENTS AND PLASTIC COUPLINGS CONNECTING THE SEGMENTS TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS WITH CONTINUOUS BENDS AND CURVESACTIVEDec 7, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 22, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance