USPTO serial 77717578
COEXIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COEXIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
/Stephen L. Baker/
/STEPHEN L. BAKER/ BAKER & RANNELLS, PA575 ROUTE 28 STE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath and shower gels and salts not for medical purposes; Bath gel; Bath gels; Bath lotion; Bath soaps; Beauty gels; Beauty lotions; Blush; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body lotion; Body powder; Body scrub; Compacts containing make-up; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic pads; Cosmetic preparations against sunburn; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for eye lashes; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic rouges; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Cosmetics and make-up; Exfoliant creams; Eye gels; Eye liner; Eye lotions; Eye shadows; Eyebrow cosmetics; Eyebrow pencils; Face and body lotions; Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial concealer; Facial scrubs; Foot scrubs; Foundation make-up; Fragrances; Hair care lotions; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Lip gloss; Lip liner; Lipsticks; Loose face powder; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Make-up powder; Make-up remover; Mascaras; Non-medicated foot lotions; Rouges; Shower gels; Skin cleansers; Skin lotions; Skin masks; Skin moisturizer masks; Skin toners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |