USPTO serial 77719675
COOPER'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOPER'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Batavia, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed onions, namely, onion petals; processed potatoes, namely, potato skins; stuffed jalapenos; mozzarella sticks, planks and bites; dips; corn dogs; chicken; bruschetta; processed mushrooms, namely, breaded mushrooms; crab cakes; potato-based snack foods; processed beans, namely, fried green beans; cheese; frozen appetizers consisting primarily of chicken or seafood | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | sandwiches, namely, stuffed sandwiches filled with pepperoni pizza, four cheese pizza, meatball, Philly steak and cheese; bagel pizzas; pizza snacks; bread flavored with spices; garlic bread; garlic cheese toast; breadsticks; soft pretzels; bagels filled with hot dogs; toasted ravioli; egg rolls; sandwiches, namely, panini sandwiches, flatbread sandwiches, hamburgers, cheeseburgers, fish sandwiches, chicken sandwiches; fried macaroni and cheese; pastries; dough-enrobed foods consisting of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of meats, poultry, fish, fruits, vegetables and cheese; quiche; sandwich wraps; cheese and corn bites; mozzarella filled dough bites; pepperoni and cheese wrapped in a flaky pastry; spinach and cheese wrapped in a flaky pastry; ham and cheese wrapped in a flaky pastry; chicken filled pastry; samosas; reuben bites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |