USPTO serial 77720655
EDENVALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDENVALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Batavia, IL
Batavia, IL
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |