USPTO serial 77720681
ROCK STAR BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCK STAR BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dorothy M. Weber
JASON A FINESTONE SHUKAT ARROW HAFER WEBER & HERBSMAN LLP111 WEST 57TH STREET SUITE 1120NEW YORK, NY 10019-2227UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sun glasses for children; Eye glass cases for children's eye glasses; Eye glass cords for children's eye glasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |