Drawing for COORDINATES

USPTO serial 77721817

COORDINATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COORDINATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph W. Berenato, III

JOSEPH W. BERENATO, III BERENATO, WHITE & STAVISH, LLC6550 ROCK SPRING DR STE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817-1173UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal doorsACTIVE—
019Non-metal doors; door lites, side lites and transom lites, all in the nature of glass and plastic panels for doors and door areasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 14, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 14, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 1, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 30, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 30, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 2, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 2, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance