USPTO serial 77723642
POWERDRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2012
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with POWERDRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Rafter
Michael W. Rafter KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800Mailstop: IP Docketing - 22Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Control regulating equipment and instruments for lighting, apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; none of the aforementioned goods in this Class include access control goods and all of the aforesaid goods to be used for lighting applications only | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ Apparatus for lighting and installations, parts for the said goods; none of the aforementioned goods in this Class include access control goods and all of the aforesaid goods to be used for lighting applications only ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EldoLAB Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by EldoLAB Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by EldoLAB Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named POWERDRIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |