USPTO serial 77723652
LINEARDRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LINEARDRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Control-regulating equipment and instruments for lighting, namely, electrical controllers, electric switch plates, electric light dimmers, electric light switches; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, power access port for use with electrical control panels for connecting multiple data and electrical devices, power amplifiers, power controllers, power transformers for amplification, electrical transformers, accumulator boxes, electric conductors, switchboards, electronic regulating and control devices for the operation of light emitting diodes; data processing equipment, namely, data processors | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, namely, lighting fixtures, LED lighting fixtures, LED lighting fixtures for use in display, commercial, industrial, residential and architectural accent lighting applications; light diffusers; lighting installations, namely, landscape lighting installations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |