USPTO serial 77723664
FRUITION INTERACTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3898460Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 4, 2011
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRUITION INTERACTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fruition Interactive, Incorporated
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Fruition Interactive, Incorporated
Fruition Interactive, Incorporated
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Fruition Interactive, Incorporated
Fruition Interactive, Incorporated
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Fruition Interactive, Incorporated
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Graphic design and user experience design, search engine optimization; computer services, namely, software design, software programming, software engineering, installing software, configuring software, and computer system administration for others; installing and configuring computer software and hardware systems to measure web site and e-mail marketing performance | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fruition Interactive, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Fruition Interactive, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Fruition Interactive, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FRUITION INTERACTIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2017 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2017 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2017 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |