USPTO serial 77726036
THE BRIGHTEST AND BEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BRIGHTEST AND BEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financing for student loans and student loan foundations, financing for student educational loans through an academic achievement program for top academic performers from local high school graduating classes | ACTIVE | Jun 27, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Student Loan Finance Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Student Loan Finance Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named THE BRIGHTEST AND BEST
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |