USPTO serial 77726316
G2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with G2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah L. Benson
JEREMY BLACKOWICZ HINCKLEY ALLEN & SNYDER LLP28 STATE STREETBOSTON, MA 02109-1775UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Betting and gambling services in the nature of interactive real time gambling, namely, bingo, poker, slot machines and sports betting, all of the foregoing transmitted via a global computer network and via mobile phones, PDAs, and portable electronic game systems; on-line casino services; providing gambling information relating to bingo, poker, slot machines, sports betting and bookmaking services all via a global computer network and via mobile phones, PDAs, and portable electronic game systems; entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting interactive peer to peer gambling competitions via global computer network and via mobile phones, PDAs, and portable electronic game systems; organizing and conducting lotteries and other games of chance via a global computer network and via mobile phones, PDAs, and portable electronic game systems; betting services, namely, online gambling using a credit card to secure the funds; gambling consulting services relating to bingo, poker, slot machines, sports betting and bookmaking services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |