Drawing for WORKINGPOINT

USPTO serial 77726434

WORKINGPOINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORKINGPOINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane J. Mason

DIANE J. MASON BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC601 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1800SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108-2823UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Business applications service provider featuring online small business software for use in accounting, online invoicing, recording and tracking of expense payments, tracking and payment of taxes on business transactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 3, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 26, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 19, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 19, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 20, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 2, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 30, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 3, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 4, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance