USPTO serial 77726444
MALABAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MALABAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN E. FELDMAN PC
STEPHEN E. FELDMAN PC Feldman Law Group, P.C.220 East 42nd StreetSuite 3304NY, NY 10017Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 5, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2010 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |