USPTO serial 77726690
CARBON GOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARBON GOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Graham Farrington
GRAHAM FARRINGTON LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Agricultural chemicals except fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and parasiticides; mixtures of chemicals and natural materials, namely, charcoal, organic charcoal, mycorrhizal fungi, seaweed, wormcast, organic coir for use as agricultural fertilizers; polymers for use in manufacturing agricultural chemicals; chemical additives for manures; ammoniacal products, namely, organic charcoal or charcoal impregnated with nitrate fertilizers for use as manure; artificial manures produced from organic waste matter; fibrous material made of coconut fibre, coir, peat, peat substitutes or organic charcoal for use as manures; liquid manure substitute; manure; manure for agriculture; manure in liquid form; manure in solid form; manures for the soil; manures for use on grass or grassland; manures obtained by the treatment of refuse with earthworms; natural manure; nitrogenous lime for agricultural purposes; organic manure; rigid manures; synthetic manures; charcoal for use as a soil conditioner | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, investment fund transfer and transaction services; carbon credit procurement and cancellation services, namely, brokerage of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emission credits, allowances or offsets on behalf of offset producers or consumers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |