Drawing for Serial No. 77727119

USPTO serial 77727119

Serial No. 77727119

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 77727119?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cristina A. Carvalho

CRISTINA A. CARVALHO ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Pet foodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 31, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 16, 2011EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Jan 7, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Dec 13, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 13, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 26, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 22, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 19, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 19, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 5, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 5, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance