Drawing for NAKED COMFORT

USPTO serial 77729260

NAKED COMFORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4122143Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 3, 2012
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAKED COMFORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Chen

DAVID CHEN IP ATTORNEYS GROUP LLC16 OXFORD ROADMILFORD, CT 06460UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025FOOTWEAR AND CLOTHING, NAMELY, BELTS, DRESSES, GLOVES, JACKETS, NECKWEAR, NIGHTWEAR, PANTS, SUITS, SWIMWEAR, SKIRTS, TOPS, BOTTOMS, UNDERWEAR, HEADWEAR, UNIFORMS, SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, SHORTS, SWEATERS, COATS, WRISTBANDS, SOCKS, HOSIERY, T-SHIRTS, SCARVES, CAPS, VESTS, AND PULLOVERSSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 9, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2016C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Oct 5, 2016CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 29, 2016CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jul 7, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2016PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 3, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 2, 2012SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED—
Mar 1, 2012REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 29, 2012CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 27, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 23, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 23, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 9, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 31, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 4, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 2, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 8, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 19, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 8, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 8, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance