USPTO serial 77729416
HÉROUX DEVTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2012
- Examiner
- HESIK, APRIL ANNE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with HÉROUX DEVTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Longueuil, Quebec, CA
Longueuil, Quebec, CA
Longueuil, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farah P. Bhatti, Esq.
Farah P. Bhatti, Esq. Buchalter, A Professional Corporation18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 800Irvine, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Parts and fittings, namely, machined components for power generation and other machineries applications, namely, nacelle shafts and gear boxes for large wind mills, machined shafts for large stationary gas turbines ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | [ Land vehicle parts, namely, parts to tie large axles and wheels in large off-road trucks; ] Parts and fittings for aircraft, namely, landing gears, spare parts for landing gears, cylinders and pistons for gears being part of aircraft landing gear; gear components for aircrafts, namely, aircraft landing gear [, wing spars, wing ribs, cockpit structural components for helicopters, large bulkheads for aircrafts, wing tips, structural parts for airplanes ] ; cylinders and pistons for gears being parts of aircraft landing gears | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance, repair and overhaul of landing gears and components thereof for aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Method and concept development in the design of landing gear systems based on aircraft specifications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Héroux-Devtek Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Héroux-Devtek Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Héroux-Devtek Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HÉROUX DEVTEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 1, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 28, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |