USPTO serial 77729610
MOLYNOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOLYNOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith Barritt
KEITH BARRITT FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals to be used in industry and science; unprocessed artificial resins to be used in industry, science and agriculture; adhesives for industry for covering and sealing; land manure; chemical products for preserving food; chemical products from molybdenum oxide for making molybdenum salts, chemical and petrochemical industry catalysts and metallic molybdenum; chemical products from molybdenum salts for making pure molybdenum oxide, metallic molybdenum and catalysts for the chemical and agriculture industry; chemical products of rhenium in all forms for making rhenium salts, catalysts to be used in the chemical industry and the making of metallic rhenium and perrhenic acid; chemical products from tungsten in all forms for making metallic tungsten, tungsten carbide and catalysts for chemical industry; chemical products from tantalum in all forms for making metallic tantalum and tantalum alloys; chemical products from niobium in all forms for making metallic niobium and alloys; chemical products from cobalt in all forms to be used in the metallurgic industry for the making of alloys and superalloys, for the making of salts to be used in the electrodeposition of metals; sulfuric acid, calcium carbide, copper oxides, copper salts and chemical products of copper in all its forms to be used in the manufacture of fungicides for use in the agriculture industry, in the manufacture of alimentary complements for use in the chicken and pigs breeding industry, for electrodeposition of copper and making of alloys in the metallurgic industry; and non-metallic minerals, namely, quartz, feldspars, clays, all for using in the chemical and metallurgic industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | common metals and their alloys for further manufacture; metallic construction materials, namely, panels, laminations, pipes, cables and filaments; molybdenum minerals and their alloys; rhenium minerals and their alloys; metallic materials for electric resistances of boilers; high temperature mechanically resistant trays, namely, metal molds for casting ceramic materials, foundry chill-molds, or metal moldings; metal corrosion resistant pipes and valves; copper minerals and their alloys; tungsten minerals and their alloys; tantalum minerals and their alloys; niobium minerals and their alloys; cobalt minerals and their alloys; and metallic products, namely, corrosion resistant laminations, sheets and pipes | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | precious metals and their alloys; and products elaborated from precious metals, namely, jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Complejo Industrial Molynor S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Complejo Industrial Molynor S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named MOLYNOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |