Drawing for MUSCLE MAIZE

USPTO serial 77729645

MUSCLE MAIZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUSCLE MAIZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine M. Clayton

CATHERINE M CLAYTON GIBBONS PCONE PENNSYLVANIA PLAZA37TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10119-3799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 20, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 20, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 7, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 19, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 13, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 7, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 7, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 4, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 4, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 8, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance