Drawing for GOLD BEAUTY

USPTO serial 77730381

GOLD BEAUTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLD BEAUTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kamenetsky

Jeffrey H. Kamenetsky Novak Druce + Quigg LLP525 Okeechobee Blvd, 15th FloorWest Palm Beach, FL 33401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003CosmeticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance