USPTO serial 77730490
W KIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with W KIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
DAVID W. GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Membership club services for shopping center patrons providing discounts to members on goods and services provided by others and providing preferred parking, customer loyalty services for promotional purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of planning children's parties and conducting arts and crafts events in the nature of workshops for children | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Concierge services for shopping center patrons comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations and providing customer-specific information to meet individual needs rendered together in a shopping center | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Westfield, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Westfield, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named W KIDS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |