Drawing for CRYO-CELL VIP

USPTO serial 77730634

CRYO-CELL VIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYO-CELL VIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott A.M. Chambers

Therese Finan PATTON BOGGS, LLP2550 M StreetWashington, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Biomedical services, namely, storage and cryogenic storage of human blood, human umbilical cord blood, human umbilical cord blood stem cells, and human menstrual stem cells for medical, therapeutic, biotechnological, cosmetic and pharmaceutical useACTIVE—
040Cryogenic preservation services for human blood, human umbilical cord blood, human umbilical cord blood stem cells, and human menstrual stem cells for medical, therapeutic, biotechnological, cosmetic and pharmaceutical use; medical analysis and testing of human blood, menstrual blood, umbilical cord blood, umbilical cord stem cells, and menstrual stem cells for medical, therapeutic, and pharmaceutical useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 8, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 29, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance