Drawing for TALENT

USPTO serial 77730690

TALENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TALENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Gitchel

Jeffrey M. Gitchel Bayer Corporationqqq100 Bayer RoadPittsburgh, PA 15205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Public relations, namely, proactive operating and initiation of opinion-forming processes in the field of Public Health and medicines in the field of medical studiesACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, providing training by means of seminars and congresses in the fields of medicine and pharmacology; organization of exhibitions for training purposes in the fields of medicine and pharmacology; providing on-line publications in the nature of books, brochures, research papers, magazines and newsletters in the field of current issues concerning public health and medicinesACTIVE—
042database design and development containing information in the field of medical and pharmaceutical research; medical and scientific research in the field of conducting clinical trials; medical and scientific research in the field of pharmaceuticals; development of pharmaceutical preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 7, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance