Drawing for NEXTERA

USPTO serial 77730769

NEXTERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXTERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Wadyka, Jr.

Steven J. Wadyka, Jr. Greenberg Traurig, LLPSuite 10002101 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20037

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037leasing of cranes, lifting and hoisting equipmentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 26, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 11, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 19, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 22, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2009ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 30, 2009EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance