USPTO serial 77731028
1866 BY HEIGHTS + KENCHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3986258Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 28, 2011
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 1866 BY HEIGHTS + KENCHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's clothing, namely, woven pants, namely, pants made from denim and non-denim materials; woven shirts, namely, shirts made from denim and non-denim material; t-shirts; knit shirts and pants; sweaters; scarves; woven and knit jackets; outerwear, namely, cotton jackets, wool jackets and leather jackets; headgear, namely, knitted hats; and accessories, namely, belts, footwear, socks and underwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kenchi, Yunusa U
- Other trademarks owned by Kenchi, Yunusa U
- Other trademarks owned by Kenchi, Yunusa U
- Other trademarks owned by KENCHI, YUNUSA U
- Other trademarks owned by Hernandez, Roberto J.
- Other trademarks owned by Hernandez, Roberto J.
- Other trademarks owned by Hernandez, Roberto J.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named 1866 BY HEIGHTS + KENCHI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 21, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |