USPTO serial 77731301
EARTHSAKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EARTHSAKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Green Bay, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Boney Denison
MARY BONEY DENISON MANELLI DENISON & SELTER PLLC2000 M ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036-3364UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All-purpose carrying bags; All-purpose reusable carrying bags; Canvas shopping bags; Carry-on bags; Drawstring bags; Mesh shopping bags; Reusable shopping bags; String bags for shopping; Textile shopping bags; Toiletry bags sold empty; Tote bags; Travel bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Laundry bags; Mesh bags for storage; Mesh lingerie bags for washing lingerie; Multi-purpose cloth bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |