Drawing for SUN RACK

USPTO serial 77731378

SUN RACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUN RACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George L. Pinchak

GEORGE L. PINCHAK TAROLLI, SUNDHEIM, COVELL & TUMMINO LLP1300 E 9TH ST STE 1700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-1504UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL STRUCTURES FOR MOUNTING CONCENTRATED PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS, CONCENTRATED SOLAR POWER PANELS, PARABOLIC SOLAR PANELS, SOLAR TRACKING PANELS, AND OTHER COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL, AND UTILITY SOLAR PANELSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 7, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 17, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 9, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance