USPTO serial 77731876
MERIT BANDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MERIT BANDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rashelle Perry
Rashelle Perry Merit Medical Systems, Inc.Legal Dept1600 W. Merit ParkwaySouth Jordan, UT 84095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, a compression device to achieve hemostasis | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |