Drawing for STEREO FWD

USPTO serial 77731893

STEREO FWD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEREO FWD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MURALI K. PASUPULATI

MURALI K. PASUPULATI THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP1722 ROUTH ST STE 1500DALLAS, TX 75201-2532UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Silver personal ornaments, jewellery ornaments of precious metal, jewellery, namely, amulets, rings, jewellery, earrings, brooches, watch cases, jewellery caskets, key rings of precious metal, namely, trinkets and fobs, necklaces, watch chains, jewellery chains, chronographs for use as watches, chronometers, diamonds, precious stones, namely, spinel, presentation cases for watches, cases for clocks and watchmaking, threads of precious metal, jewellery of yellow amber, ivory jewellery, medals, medallions, precious metal thread, gold thread, gold unwrought or beaten, precious stones, precious metal stones, semi-precious stones, charms, silver thread, threads of precious metal, namely, spun silver jewelry, silver unwrought or beaten, paste jewellery, bracelets, watch chains, atomic clocks, master control clocks, wristwatches, sun dialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance