Drawing for TIP-ON-TUBE

USPTO serial 77731967

TIP-ON-TUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIP-ON-TUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle M. Globerman

Kyle M. Globerman Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP100 North Tryon Street, 42nd FloorIP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202-4000

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Electrosurgical generators and accessories therefor, namely, electrosurgical return pads, electrosurgical pencils, medical electrode tips and electrosurgical cords and cables; surgical smoke evacuators and accessories therefor, namely, smoke evacuator tubing, filters, hand-pieces and suction pumps; electrosurgical pencils and accessories therefor, namely, medical electrode tips; bipolar forceps for medical use and accessories therefor, namely, electrosurgical cables and connectors; low and high temperature cauteries for surgical use and accessories therefor, namely, electrosurgical cautery pencils and structural replacement tips therefor; saline enhanced electrosurgical resection devices, namely, electrosurgical apparatuses and instruments for use in the surgical removal of part of organs and tissues and surgical sealing of blood vessels and similar structures; laparoscopic and arthroscopic instruments; disposable and reusable medical electrodesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance