USPTO serial 77732762
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Brampton, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Scott
JAMES L SCOTT WARNER NORCROSS JUDD LLP111 LYON ST NWSUITE 900GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE THAT COMBINES AUDIO COMPUTER FILES AND GRAPHICS COMPUTER FILES FOR USE WITH COMPUTER KARAOKE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND KARAOKE PLAYERS AND MACHINES | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1998 |
| 035 | ON LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PLAYING KARAOKE AND PRE-RECORDED SOUND AND IMAGE FILES FOR KARAOKE | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |