Drawing for PANTHER

USPTO serial 77732851

PANTHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PANTHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr.

Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr. Higgs Fletcher & Mack LLP401 West A Street, Suite 2600San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005CHEMICAL REAGENTS AND BUFFERS FOR USE WITH AUTOMATED IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC CLINICAL/MEDICAL SPECIMEN ANALYZER; KITS COMPRISING REAGENTS AND BUFFERS FOR IN VITRO MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC USEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 7, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 8, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 8, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 8, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Mar 31, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 9, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 10, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 1, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 16, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 16, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 8, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 12, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance