USPTO serial 77733444
Serial No. 77733444
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77733444?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lerner
MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVE RM 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Air freshening preparations; air purifying preparations; room air fresheners; air deodorant; preparations for neutralizing odours on carpeting, textiles, surfaces and in the air | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | Electric and battery powered dispensers for room fragrances, air fresheners and room deodorants for scenting, purifying or freshening the atmosphere; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods sold as a unit therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |