USPTO serial 77734078
GREENZORB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREENZORB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BARRINGTON CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
WAGENER, SC
BARRINGTON CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
WAGENER, SC
AIKEN, SC
AIKEN, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew C. Aitken
Andrew C. Aitken General Counsel, PC6862 Elm StreetMcLean, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical composition for solidification of fluids and for absorbing spills; Chemicals for industrial purposes; Chemicals for treating hazardous waste; Chemicals for use in industry and science; Chemicals for use in the decontamination of polluted sites; Oil reclamation fluid for the separation of crude oil from soil and water, all of the aforementioned goods being environmentally friendly | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Environmentally friendly cleaning agents and preparations; Environmentally friendly cleaning preparations for cleaning surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BARRINGTON CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BARRINGTON CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GSSG GREEN-CLEAN, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SORBENT GREEN, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named GREENZORB
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ISTB | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE-TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ISTB | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE-TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |