Drawing for PETRI

USPTO serial 77735582

PETRI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3750882Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 16, 2010
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETRI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth W. King

Elizabeth W. King Conley Rose, P.C.P.O. Box 3267Houston, TX 77253-3267UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fish, fish preserves, fish products, namely fish salad in fresh and deep-frozen form; dried fishSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2016C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jul 15, 2016C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jul 15, 2016ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2015REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2010R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jan 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2009CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance