Drawing for CLIC

USPTO serial 77735774

CLIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009EYEGLASSES AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, EYEGLASS MOUNTSACTIVEDec 26, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 2, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 1, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 22, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 20, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance