Drawing for GELLERT HEALTH SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 77735966

GELLERT HEALTH SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GELLERT HEALTH SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerry Cohen

JERRY COHEN BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 SUMMER ST STE 600BOSTON, MA 02110-1624UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical and nutraceutical preparations for the treatment of arthritis and joint pain, namely, over the counter pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals derived from glucosamine and medicinal herbsACTIVEMay 1, 2011
035Retail store services, namely, providing pharmaceutical and nutraceutical preparationsACTIVEMay 1, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2011SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 15, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 15, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 15, 2011PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Feb 14, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 7, 2011PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 15, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance