USPTO serial 77736148
SOLARTECH AN INITIATIVE OF SILICON VALLEY LEADERSHIP GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3917652Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 2011
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOLARTECH AN INITIATIVE OF SILICON VALLEY LEADERSHIP GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SolarTech, An Initiative of Silicon Valley Leadership Group dba SolarTech
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by SolarTech, An Initiative of Silicon Valley Leadership Group dba SolarTech
SolarTech, An Initiative of Silicon Valley Leadership Group dba SolarTech
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by SolarTech, An Initiative of Silicon Valley Leadership Group dba SolarTech
SolarTech, An Initiative of Silicon Valley Leadership Group dba SolarTech
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by SolarTech, An Initiative of Silicon Valley Leadership Group dba SolarTech
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Cady
JAMES R. CADY HOWREY LLP1950 UNIVERSITY AVE FL 4EAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2250UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting public awareness of solar energy technology, implementation and use of solar energy technology, and the need for standards in implementing solar energy technology; public advocacy to promote awareness of solar energy technology and to promote the adoption of standards for implementing solar energy technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing information in the field of solar energy technology; consultation services in the field of solar energy technology; development of voluntary standards for solar energy technology and for the adoption and implementation of solar energy technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SolarTech, An Initiative of Silicon Valley Leadership Group dba SolarTech
- Other trademarks owned by SolarTech, An Initiative of Silicon Valley Leadership Group dba SolarTech
- Other trademarks owned by SolarTech, An Initiative of Silicon Valley Leadership Group dba SolarTech
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SOLARTECH AN INITIATIVE OF SILICON VALLEY LEADERSHIP GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 18, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |