USPTO serial 77736394
AMAYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMAYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C. Katz
JEFFREY C KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAY FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10019-4379UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats, soups, stocks, bouillons and broths; soup, stock, bouillon and broth concentrates; preparations for making soups, stocks, bouillons and broths; pickles; preserves, namely, edible oils, fats and pickles; potato crisps and potato chips, croquettes of fish, fruit and meat; fruit, fruit salads, vegetable juices for cooking, dried lentils, milk-based beverages containing fruit juices and mixes therefor, processed nuts, processed peanuts, dried peas, salads except macaroni, rice and pasta salads, preserved vegetables, vegetable salads, yoghurt, drinking yogurt; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables and including combinations of some or all of the aforesaid foods; dairy based chocolate food beverages; all of the foregoing for use in Indian food recipes, Indian dishes or marketed as an Indian ingredient or dish | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal based snack foods, processed cereals, cereal based energy bars not used as a meal replacement; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, confectionery chips for baking, crystal sugar pieces, frozen confectionery, flavored ices; honey, treacle, yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar; sauces, spices, salad dressings, chutneys and curry powder; preparations made from rice, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of rice, rice cakes; prepared savory foodstuffs in the form of cereal based snack foods, snack foods and ready prepared meals primarily made of pasta or rice; pies; concentrates, namely, vegetable concentrate used for seasoning, flavorings and mixes in the nature of concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of tea based beverages, coffee-, and cocoa - based beverages, cereal based chips made from corn and flour; condiments, namely, relishes, sauces, seasoning, curry being a spice, flavorings and essences for foodstuffs, namely, coffee essences, essences for making flavored mineral water not in the nature of essential oils, farinaceous foods, namely, farina, farinaceous food paste for human consumption made from flour, cereal, wheat, oats and grains, maize flakes, gravies, halvah, ice cream, herbal infusions, meal, namely, corn, cracker, maize gluten, noodles, pastries, peanut confectionery chips for baking, pies, pizzas, puddings and desserts, namely, bakery desserts, mousse, soufflés, sandwiches, seasonings, sherbets and sorbets, tarts, tea, tea-based beverages, turmeric for food; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice and also including combinations of some or all of the aforesaid foods; processed herbs; salad dressings; all of the foregoing for use in Indian food recipes, Indian dishes or marketed as an Indian ingredient or dish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |