Drawing for I GOT IT ALL !

USPTO serial 77736753

I GOT IT ALL !

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with I GOT IT ALL !?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay M. Schloff

Jay M. Schloff Aidenbaum Schloff and Bloom PLLC6960 Orchard Lake RoadSuite 315West Bloomfield, MI 48322

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, tops, t-shirts, jerseys, sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts, zip front hooded sweatshirts, hats, caps, visors, belts, pants, shorts, undergarments and shoes, belts for clothing, coats, jogging pants, jogging suitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 22, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 16, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 15, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 15, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 15, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 13, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 13, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance