USPTO serial 77737091
ENDURO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENDURO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monique A. Morneault
ULRIKA E MATTSSON McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5058UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Portable power tools, namely, angle grinders, circular saws, drills, drivers, jig saws, reciprocating saws, rotary tools, routers, sanders, air compressors, angle grinders, buffers, caulk guns, cut out saws, fans, planers, laminate trimmer, electric screwdrivers, power staplers, vacuums; power tool accessories, namely, circular saw blades, jig saw blades, drill bits, driver bits, router bits, router bushings; benchtop power tools, namely, miter saws, router tables specially adapted to hold powered machinery, table saws and tile saws; lawn and garden power tools, namely, string line trimmers, hedge trimmers, grass shears, electric leaf blowers, pole hedge trimmers, chainsaws, pole saws, lawn mowers; lawn and garden power tool accessories, namely, replacement blades, replacement line | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 28, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |